estroyed, what can the r
ld fast that which is
nd sell it not."
, it was needful for me to write unto you and exhort you that you should earn
he traditions which ye have been taught, whe
fense of the gospel.
fend itself in the future as in the past-that our duty is to preach the gospel. Certainly the victories of the gospel are a noble defense of its truth and power to save. There should be no respite from this work. But there are vast multitudes of people that permit the critics to do their thinking for them.
ess has gained for them a wide hearing. Shall the Christian people deny themselves this instrumentality of getting a hearing for God and his t
icism widely sown by the destructive critics has entered the
ht of the story of the resurrection, and refine the risen Son of God into nothing more than the spirit and essence of truth; or, at most, t
d deliberate piracy." They "demonstrate with cool precision that the higher critics of to-day are better informed concerning the mistakes of Moses than was he who claimed that Moses wrote of him, and prove to
r theological professors have substituted the theory of evolution for the Scriptural doctrine of creation by the Word of God. Our youn
hich the destructive critics have never entered-institutions that stand for the Word of G
of reading fiction, that form of literature has become a convenient vehicle for taking everything out of the hands of Providence. It has become easy to leave God out of his universe and supplant h
estament was devoted to the exposure of the "New Thought" of their times. Moses dealt thoroughly with the new theology that asserted:
unity of Jews and Gentiles in one Church, which is the body of Christ. In his Epistle to the Corinthians he answered their false views of marriage. He shamed their partisan spirit, in which some claimed to be of Paul, some of Apollos, some of Christ. He labored most earn
minate the supernatural from the Word of God. The critical work that logically leaves us a Savior ignorant of the Scriptures, or, if knowing them, a