the first instance except at his wish, nor re-undertaken in September last without his encouragement. There are probably a good many besides myself who owe it to

g his visit to France and Flanders inspired all who saw him by the quiet confidence of his words and manner. After the funeral service at Headquarters a friend of his and mine wrote to me describing the scene. The religious ceremony had taken place in the entra

which he trusted his instinct. But the firmness of his trust was not due in the least to self-conceit, or arrogance, or obstinacy. He obeyed his instinct as he obeyed his conscience-humbly and devoutly. The dictates of both proceeded from the same sourc

lt to out-argue him. Plausible and perspicacious persons often left him, after an interview, under the firm impression that they had convinced him. Bu

xi

ke his conclusion, were in the nature of statements; they were not stages in an argument. There are as many unanswerable reasons to be given for as against most human decisions. Ingenuity and eloquence are a curse at councils of war, and state, and business. Indeed,

sword on his side; he took all things in good part, and interpreted every action in the best sense. In a leading German newspaper there appeared, a few days after his death, the following reference to that event:-"It was not given to Lord Roberts to see the realisation of his dreams of National Service; but the blows struc

trace of malice against the man who had warned his fellow-countrymen, more clearly than any other, against the premeditated aggression of Germany. This seems very strange when we recollect how, for nearly two years previously, a large section of the British nation had been engaged in denouncing Lord Roberts for the outrageous provocat