e Council, Chamber of Deputies in the Session

tle

ture to remind him that he has not done full justice to the Government and to the Ministry of 1831 in expressing his apparent belief that the diff

Polish nation all that it was its duty to do. It did more than any other nation, and if history ever reveals the diplomatic correspondence of the F

ce, the Government has never ceased to do whenever it thought tha

other state must be conducted with every care and precaution. There is often a reason to fear that such intervention, far from calming irritation and exasperation and far

nity and that it is indeed against the wishes of the Chamber to press the Government to further efforts in this place. It is to be feared that words actuated by generous feeling may indeed produce an effect entirely contrary to the sentiments which inspire

eaks for the Government, and those of an isolated member of the Chamber. The Chamber will certainly understand that it is not for me to reply severa

t be faithfully executed both in their letter and their spirit, but in the article of the treaty to which the two orators have referred, different principles are enounced; principles which are not incompatible, and should indeed be reconciled; on the one hand the Independence of Poland

hypothetical case-that the several Powers will not agree upon the application of these principles, or upon the nature of the action that lies before them. Are we to say that the moment a difference of opinion arises, we should immediately have recourse to force? The Chamber cannot countenance

it, that there are divergences of opinion between the different Powers upon certain points. We consider that negotiations, discu