me in the public list of writers and contributors to the Leader-the first recognition of the kind I received,

when I found a vacant place at the head of their graves which lie side by si

statements without the signature of a known and responsible person. On the first opportunity I spoke with Lewes's eldest son, and asked authority to contradict them. He thought the calumnies beneath contempt, that they sprang up in theological soil and that they would wither of themselves, if not fertilised by disturbance. I know

provision made for the present and future interest of every one concerned. Conventional opinion, not even in its ethical aspects, could establish higher relations than existed in their case. There are thousan

in George Eliot's mind. When Garibaldi was at the Crystal Palace

f the History of Co-operation, I receiv

s, Rickm

15,

e,-Mrs. Lewes wi

your book, which she

much to our pleasu

and quiet epigr

adable; and this s

hat you did not

ls. Perhaps they w

lu

yours

H. L

ork mentioned supplied to

y be read in the second volume of the "History of Co-operation" referred to. When George Eliot saw the letter she said, "the thought of the Ruins of Education there described filled her with sadness." I made an offer to buy the neglected and decaying re

r's conception of personal charm. One day when she was living at Godstone, she drove to the station to meet Mr. Lewes. He and I were travelling together at the time, and he caused the tra

aracteristic conviction of George Eliot, from which sh

esponsibilities, of which they alone know anything, to an invisible world, which can alone be apprehended by belief, they are led to neglect their duty to each other, to squander their strength in vain speculations, which

nalist April,

Autobio